At 04:01 PM 5/31/02 -0400, you wrote:
>I don't know enough about their software but what will undoubtedly happen 
>is that email admins will block their servers and that
>will create false negatives.

Are you saying admins will block the servers of the list cleaning service?

If they do not, will the procedure create false negatives?

>  There are just too many variables for a company to provide a service 
> that verifies email addresses.
>It's a crock.

That was not my customer's problem.  We were at the other end: To remove as 
many bad addresses as possible without doing it manually one-by-one.  Their 
problem was that 2300 messages had bounced on one mailing.  This flooded a 
poor secretary's mailbox and made it unusable over a modem connection.  The 
list cleaner deleted 722 addresses as bad.  Whether or not any are false 
negatives I cannot say.  Just looking at the numbers though, the numbers 
themselves do not suggest there are false negatives, as would, for example, 
a list cleaner that claimed 4,000 bad addresses when only 2300 had bounced 
after an actual mailing.

best,  paul


>As Colin Quinn would say, that's my opinion and I'm stickin' to it.
>
>Regards,
>
>Howie
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (paul smith)>
>To: "inFusion Support List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:52 PM
>Subject: Re: [iMS] checking valid email
>
>
> > Back to the question:
> >
> >  > But back to crock et al, are you also saying their methods will also 
> give
> >  > false indications of bad addresses?
> >
> > best, paul
> >
> >
>
==^=======================================================
     This list server is Powered by iMS
   "The Swiss Army Knife of Mail Servers"
   --------------------------------------
To leave this list please complete the form at 
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSSupport.cfm
Need an iMS Developer license?  Sign up for a free license here:
http://www.coolfusion.com/iMSDevelopers.cfm
List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/infusion-email%40eoscape.com/
Note: You are subscribed as [email protected]
==^=======================================================


Reply via email to