Am I missing something here? I've been using Inline on CYGWIN_NT-5.0 with gcc all
along.
-David
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Brian Ingerson wrote:
>
> If you're stuck on Windows and would like to use Inline, but just don't
> have the cash or pirating tendencies to get MS Visual C++, there is now
> an alternative. I just finished compiling Perl on Win2K with Mingw32/gcc
> and dmake in the cmd shell. And Inline-0.40-TRIAL6 worked without a
> problem. This solution is completely free of extra money, and now that
> I've figured it out it can be free of extra time for you.
>
> Is this of interest to anybody? Let me know, and I'll add some doc for
> it.
>
> The next step is to try and resolve the issues of doing this on
> WinME/9x. A much more daunting task to be sure. I'm pretty sure Inline
> will need a patch for this.
>
> After that I'll spend some spare cycles trying to find out if gcc can
> work with ActivePerl. Obviously, there's not as many people out there
> using gcc. So sharing your newly creating gcc/Inline gems would be
> problematic.
>
> Cheers, Brian
>
> --
> perl -le 'use Inline C=>q{SV*JAxH(char*x){return newSVpvf
> ("Just Another %s Hacker",x);}};print JAxH+Perl'
