Well, *that's* good reason for me not to upgrade gcc, I guess. I'm using
2.95.2 as well.
Paul, I'm using the Perl 5.6.0 version running under WinME, and Perl itself
(although many of the tests fail) seems to run OK. I don't use it a whole
lot, but enough that casual problems would be discovered. I'm having
serious problems getting Inline to run, though. The MMWin32.pm has two
instances of 2>&1 which kill command.com, and it also doesn't hide all the
functions in MMUnix.pm which have more. If I hand-modify both those to
appease command.com, then Inline builds the Makefile just fine and dandy --
but dmake doesn't actually manage to execute it, for some reason.
Unfortunately I only have an executable of dmake (no source) and
dmake.wtiwhatever.com was down yesterday, so that's as far as I've gotten
with it, but as you seem to be making more progress than I, I thought I'd
chip in... What version dmake are you running?
Michael
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 10:22:36PM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> > Which version of Perl did
> > you compile? I'm assuming a stock 5.6.1 which is my next target.
>
> And I'm guessing at the gcc-2.95.2 release of MinGW rather than the
> later development snapshot which doesn't compile recent versions of Perl
> out-of-the-box. Is that right?
>
> --
> Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.pjcj.net
