Andrew Alder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I think you are assuming that heterosexual and homosexual relationships are >equally good. But that is the whole question at the centre of this. IMO, a >lot of the pain we are undergoing at present is because neither side is >prepared to ask it honestly, let alone to answer it.
I am saying I believe the quality of a relationship is independent of the sexual orientation of the people involved. Given all other things (faithfulness, committment, respect, love, etc.) are equal, then two relationships that differ only in there hetero- or homo-sexual nature are equally good. >>(Of course, that would set up a whole other debate on the pros/cons of >>requiring ministers to be ordained, but let's not go there.... ) > >I think that would be an excellent place to go. Why not? At present, I don't have the time to commit to another thread - but that does not stop yourself and others picking up the issue if you want. Cheers, Jonathan __________________________________________________________________ McAfee VirusScan Online from the Netscape Network. Comprehensive protection for your entire computer. Get your free trial today! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/computing/mcafee/index.jsp?promo=393397 Get AOL Instant Messenger 5.1 free of charge. Download Now! http://aim.aol.com/aimnew/Aim/register.adp?promo=380455 ------------------------------------------------------ - You are subscribed to the mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put in the message body 'unsubscribe insights-l' (ell, not one (1)) See: http://nsw.uca.org.au/lists.htm ------------------------------------------------------
