|
I am extremely disturbed (a) that the President of
the UCA declined the invitation and (b) that some of my social justice
colleagues agree with him. Part of our role as a church is to be a voice for the
voiceless in the "presence of the powers that be". During George Bush's visit,
almost every Australian was rendered voiceless. Apparently those invited to the
meeting that Gordon Moyes attended, and the UCA President declined to attend,
were allowed to voice the issues that they considered important. In my
view, if the President of the UCA was invited to speak to the US President, then
the President of the UCA should have accepted the invitation. Even the leaders
of his own church, the United Methodist Church of the USA, have not been able to
meet with Bush about the war in Iraq. Some of them went to gaol after being
arrested in demonstrations. The Methodist and other church leaders in the US
resorted to a full page advertisement calling on him to repent, because they
could not address him directly. I want to weep. I feel betrayed. I am
angry. I think the whole church has been betrayed.
So often in the past twelve months I longed for a
church leader to have the opportunity to tell Bush face to face about the
church opposition to the war on Iraq and the way he is conducting the so-called
war on terrorism, and to object to his assumption that God is guiding
him. The UCA President had the chance, and he turned it down. I'm
sorry, but meeting with people in WA could be done on other days. Talking to the
US President could not. For a church leader, being prepared for the Kingdom of
God, being spiritually alert, is about being ready and able to take this sort of
opportunity when it offers. Not accepting the invitation is an utter
distortion of the solidarity model - a betrayal, a refusal to use
the representative role and power that the church has given him and
the government acknowledged by this invitation.
Dean could have made his agenda to mention: church
and community opposition to the war on Iraq, our concern about the US doctrine
of pre-emptive strikes and the way they have undermined the UN, our concern
about US not understanding the way developing nations view the WTO and the free
trade agenda, our concerns about the USA-Australia FTA, our concern about
the US reneging on nuclear disarmament agreements and re-igniting the
arms race. And so on. He might not have got through all
these, but he could have tried. Why do we bother doing all our research,
listening, reflection, writing and advocacy on global issues, when our UCA
President fails to take the opportunity to meet with the single most powerful
individual in the world, who has so much power over so many aspects of global
violence and injustice? How can we expect President Bush to respond to our views
if we refuse to meet him to put our views to him? I feel betrayed and
disillusioned. The Methodist Church in the US might well feel betrayed as well.
According to the God of Ezekiel, by failing to be a prophetic voice when we had
the chance, we share the responsibility for the harm that Bush and the US
continue to do and God will hold us accountable. By failing to speak to him,
blood on his hands becomes blood on our hands.
Ann
(Rev. Dr.) Ann Wansbrough
UnitingCare NSW.ACT PO Box A 2178 Sydney South 1235 Phone (61) (02) 8267 4280 Fax (61) (02) 9267 4842 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
- uniting church minister meets us president Stephen Webb
- Re: uniting church minister meets us president Ann Wansbrough
- Re: uniting church minister meets us president Stephen Webb
- Re: uniting church minister meets us president Ann Wansbrough
- Re: uniting church minister meets us president Stephen Webb
- RE: uniting church minister meets us president darren wright
- RE: uniting church minister meets us president Terence Corkin
- RE: uniting church minister meets us president Rodd Clarkson
- RE: uniting church minister meets us president Lindsay Brash
- RE: uniting church minister meets us president Bev Fabb
