|
Hello Andrew and List,
I appreciate this discussion. Andrew, do you
think your argumentation is workable only because one of the assumptions of
'marriage' is that it is exclusively a union of male and female; as I reflected
on your comments, it seems you have merely taken all the issues up
to another level, but not really resolved them... what happens to your
thinking if the Government included same sex couples within the definition of
marriage?
Louis van Laar, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minister, Footscray Central Parish of the Uniting Church in Australia |
- Re: Qualifications for ministry. Trevor Mattiske
- RE: Qualifications for ministry. Jonathan Arthur
- RE: Qualifications for ministry. Andrew Alder
- RE: Qualifications for ministry. Jonathan Arthur
- RE: Qualifications for ministry. Andrew Alder
- Re: Qualifications for ministry (reply to Lou... Louis van Laar
- Re: Qualifications for ministry (reply to... Andrew Alder
- RE: Qualifications for ministry. Jonathan Arthur
- RE: Qualifications for ministry. Andrew Alder
- Re: Qualifications for ministry. Lindsay Cullen
- Re: Qualifications for ministry (reply to... Andrew Alder
- RE: Qualifications for ministry. Jonathan Arthur
- RE: Qualifications for ministry (reply to Jonatha... Andrew Alder
