James Carlson wrote: > Kyle McDonald writes: > >> Dave Miner wrote: >> >>> Anything you see in SXCE right now is similarly subject to change, I >>> just have to run appropriate ARC cases. We've just done you a favor >>> already and told you that certain technologies in it are a dead end >>> before that process starts, and you have an unprecedented (for this >>> community) opportunity to start using their replacements as soon as >>> they're even remotely functional. >>> >> Ok. Maybe I was mistaken. I thought the ARC has the capability to reject >> or change things submitted to it (not that it will - I'm only looking >> forward to hearing the discussions that take place and the opinions of >> the memebers.) >> > > Of course it does. What makes you suggest that it does not? > > Sorry. The sarcasm must have gotten lost in the email. Maybe I misread what dave wrote, but it sounded like he was saying that all the changes in OpenSolaris would have no issues getting integrated into SXCE.
I was looking to have some questions answered, but I really didn't want this to devolve into an argument or a fight. I'm sorry I even replied to your first message now. -Kyle
