Joe, > Regarding NATs, they already don't listen to MUSTs, so I don't see the > point in issuing SHOULDs they're going to ignore as well ;-) >
I guess this was said at least partially tongue in cheek. But if not, we need to talk about the distinction between helping well-behaved implementations vs. forcing everyone to do something. We don't always succeed in the latter (or even want to), but the former is still valuable. Jari _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
