-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Jari Arkko wrote: > Joe, > >> Regarding NATs, they already don't listen to MUSTs, so I don't see the >> point in issuing SHOULDs they're going to ignore as well ;-) >> > > I guess this was said at least partially tongue in cheek. But if not, we > need to talk about the distinction between helping well-behaved > implementations vs. forcing everyone to do something. We don't always > succeed in the latter (or even want to), but the former is still valuable. Agreed to the former. IMO, though, it's not always clear how much effort is useful, since I expect more of the latter to be actual practice. Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkjG09MACgkQE5f5cImnZrshywCg+uWtKgoTpobdnce/0oD7/0AK j50AnRqawBEpreCob+qtuFcffw2FT0AD =K13O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
