Dear Lars, Could be more explict and explain what is missing in draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02 to reach that stage?
Thanks. Cheers, Med >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Eggert, Lars [mailto:l...@netapp.com] >Envoyé : vendredi 27 juillet 2012 18:29 >À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP >Cc : sarik...@ieee.org; Internet Area >Objet : Re: [Int-area] Completion of working group last call >for draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02 > >On Jul 27, 2012, at 0:09, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: >> The argument I heard in Paris meeting for including a >recommendation is to help vendors to select the solution to >implement in their devices. They can not provide the same >feature using 8 implementation options. That argument makes >sense to me. > >We're not at the stage yet where we can recommend anything to >vendors. We first need to determine if there even is a >solution where the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. > >Lars _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
