On Aug 8, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Scott Brim wrote: > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Joe Touch <to...@isi.edu> wrote: >> >> On Aug 6, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Dan Wing wrote: >> >>> ... >>> During the INTAREA presentation, one suggestion I heard was >>> a separate protocol (ident-like). I will submit an I-D towards >>> that end, which I am dusting off from 2010 when I first >>> considered ident and discarded it for a variety of reasons. >>> >>> Do you have additional suggestions on how to accomplish convey >>> an identifer? >> >> >> There are two separate problems: >> >> - establishing an identity and pairing it with a tag >> >> - getting that tag into connections so each connection can be correlated >> back to the identity > > 3) making sure that not everyone can associate the identity with that tag.
or forge it, etc. Yes, there are numerous conditions on the two steps above. I tend to think of these as steps (as above) and conditions on the steps. Joe _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
