On 11 Sep 2012, at 10:55, Pars Mutaf wrote:
>
> "Do you have some running code?"
>
> These are all ideas and behavior that we adopted without questioning. We use
> them in wrong situations generally.
Which already exists in many forms of translation mechanisms that we
know are not the best way to solve the problem. There are plenty of documents
on the Internet that will tell you why.
>
> We first discuss the idea, then implement.
>
> The fact that there is running code doesn't mean that it is a good idea.
But if it were, it would help to convince the sceptical like me.
Also, the fact that there is not running code could mean that the idea
is impractical and infeasible.
Cheers,
as
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Arturo Servin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 11 Sep 2012, at 08:20, Pars Mutaf wrote:
>
>> Discrete IP:
>>
>> 1. Can be a very good transition mechanism to worldwide IPv6 without
>> enforcement (meaning that we have no idea what is good for others)
>
> Do you have some running code?
>
>> 2. Can solve the IP transition problem forever.
>
> Forgive for being sceptical of those all magical technologies that
> solve all the problems of the world. Of course, if you had running code that
> would change my view.
>
> Cheers,
> as
>
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
