The big flaw of your idea is that you suppose that translation
magically works, which it is not true due to the complexity of some protocols.
That is why I am sceptical.
You are very welcome to try your idea. Let me know how it goes.
/as
On 11 Sep 2012, at 11:21, Pars Mutaf wrote:
> Hi Arturo,
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Arturo Servin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 11 Sep 2012, at 10:55, Pars Mutaf wrote:
>
>>
>> "Do you have some running code?"
>>
>> These are all ideas and behavior that we adopted without questioning. We use
>> them in wrong situations generally.
>
> Which already exists in many forms of translation mechanisms that we
> know are not the best way to solve the problem. There are plenty of documents
> on the Internet that will tell you why.
>
>
> I believe that people should be able to choose their own solutions. Would you
> transition to IPv6 if Discrete IP worked for you? Some entities may, others
> may not, others may do it when they have money, yet others may invent and use
> IPv7. We cannot know.
>
> This means that China may use IPv6, Uruguay may not. We see what people
> decide, we cannot force them. They use translators if they wish. I want to
> develop and test a new IPvX in my university and be reachable to the world,
> who can say no?
>
> Not knowing what is good for others, not knowing the future, helps technology
> develop. It also reduces our suffering because we do not try to know the
> unknowable.
>
>
>>
>> We first discuss the idea, then implement.
>>
>> The fact that there is running code doesn't mean that it is a good idea.
>
>
> But if it were, it would help to convince the sceptical like me.
>
>
> I don't see why this would convince you.
>
>
> Also, the fact that there is not running code could mean that the idea
> is impractical and infeasible.
>
>
> No you can implement anything. Even the worst idea.
>
> Pars
>
>
> Cheers,
> as
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Arturo Servin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 11 Sep 2012, at 08:20, Pars Mutaf wrote:
>>
>>> Discrete IP:
>>>
>>> 1. Can be a very good transition mechanism to worldwide IPv6 without
>>> enforcement (meaning that we have no idea what is good for others)
>>
>> Do you have some running code?
>>
>>> 2. Can solve the IP transition problem forever.
>>
>> Forgive for being sceptical of those all magical technologies that
>> solve all the problems of the world. Of course, if you had running code that
>> would change my view.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> as
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
