On 3/7/2014 1:30 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
Hi Joe,
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Joe Touch <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Brian,
Although I don't disagree with the points below, it's useful to
consider that INT is already working in this area, so I don't see
either (a) or (c) as being relevant unless you expect to shift
current INT docs to other WGs too.
Respectfully disagree.
There has been some time passed since then and many thing happened such
as hiaps and a solution draft submission to tcpm.
IMO:
TCMP - TCP *minor* mods.
TSVWG - TCP major mods or mods that affect multiple transports (IMO this
should).
INT - endpoint IDs, except specific solutions like HIP and mobility
BEHAVE - changes local to how NATs work
Use case draft contains many more use cases than was discussed before.
Different use cases may require different solutions at different levels.
I think it is the mystery of this century to find out where this works
belongs :-).
If it is then IMO you need to consider splitting it into separate docs.
Joe
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
