Lucy,

We always arrange the agenda by Internet Area announcements, WG drafts,
individual drafts that have been presented/discussed before, and new
individual drafts - in that strict order.

Your presentation was the last on the list, and the reason for not
presenting was that we ran out of time. It is not the first time that this
happens and one or more presentations are not given. There were several
questions on items that have been pending for a while, so we gave
preference to people asking questions (including you) over presentation
time.

If you want to present your draft in the future, you can request time again
for the next meeting. However, we will still allocate agenda time in the
same strict order. If on the other hand what you want is to get technical
feedback from the group, you should rely on the mailing list and not the
meeting time, which tends to be very limited.

Juan-Carlos


On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Lucy yong <[email protected]> wrote:

> *Hi Juan and Wassim,*
>
>
>
> *It was my surprise that my talk time was cut out due to whatever reason.
> I informed you very early about this new draft coming and asked 10min for
> the talk, then the talk was cut to 5min and then not given a chance to talk
> at all in the meeting. We worked very hard to make the deadline for this
> new draft/topic in order to get people comments/suggestions on this topic.
> I don’t know what is your rule to arrange the meeting and talks. However
> the reason you gave after the meeting is not acceptable.*
>
>
>
> *Regards,*
>
> *Lucy*
>
>
>
> *From:* Int-area [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Juan
> Carlos Zuniga
> *Sent:* Monday, November 21, 2016 3:22 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [Int-area] IETF97 Minutes
>
>
>
> Here they are:
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-97-intarea/
>
>
>
> Thanks to Ian Farrer (and other Etherpad scribes) for taking notes during
> the meeting.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Juan Carlos & Wassim
>
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to