Hi Lucy, Fully agree with Juan Carlos's assessment. This is how I was allocating time as well when I was the WG chair. The best way to get your slot earlier in the agenda is to get more discussion on the list *prio*r to the scheduling deadline for the meeting. The chairs use this information to estimate a slot duration. The deadline for the chairs to request a meeting for Seoul was *September 30th 2016*. Your draft was submitted on the final day of the draft submission deadline which was October 31 2016. Please try to get the discussion going on the mailing list and if there is enough material to discuss, I am sure the chairs will request a longer slot next time.
Thanks Suresh On 11/28/2016 09:36 PM, Juan Carlos Zuniga wrote: > Lucy, > > We currently have only 5 WG accepted work items. IETF meeting-time is a > precious and scarce resource that we try to optimize for all attendees. > > Regarding the purpose of the IntArea meeting, please refer to the charter. A > presentation like yours falls in the secondary role of the group, and for > planning and other purposes it will be treated as such. > > Juan-Carlos > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Lucy yong <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > /Hi Juan-Carlos,____/ > > /__ __/ > > /Could you request a long time for the WG meeting. The WG has 9 items and > one hour meeting; it is too short. I doubt if I will get a time in next > meeting if it is like this time. Allocating many 5min talks in a meeting > means no question at all. Is it the WG meeting intend?____/ > > /__ __/ > > /Regards,____/ > > /Lucy____/ > > /__ __/ > > *From:*Juan Carlos Zuniga [mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>] > *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2016 7:44 PM > *To:* Lucy yong > *Cc:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [Int-area] IETF97 Minutes____ > > __ __ > > Lucy,____ > > __ __ > > We always arrange the agenda by Internet Area announcements, WG drafts, > individual drafts that have been presented/discussed before, and new > individual drafts - in that strict order. ____ > > __ __ > > Your presentation was the last on the list, and the reason for not > presenting was that we ran out of time. It is not the first time that > this happens and one or more presentations are not given. There were > several questions on items that have been pending for a while, so we gave > preference to people asking questions (including you) over presentation > time. ____ > > __ __ > > If you want to present your draft in the future, you can request time > again for the next meeting. However, we will still allocate agenda time > in the same strict order. If on the other hand what you want is to get > technical feedback from the group, you should rely on the mailing list > and not the meeting time, which tends to be very limited.____ > > __ __ > > Juan-Carlos ____ > > __ __ > > __ __ > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Lucy yong <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:____ > > /Hi Juan and Wassim,/____ > > / /____ > > /It was my surprise that my talk time was cut out due to whatever reason. > I informed you very early about this new draft coming and asked 10min for > the talk, then the talk was cut to 5min and then not given a chance to > talk at all in the meeting. We worked very hard to make the deadline for > this new draft/topic in order to get people comments/suggestions on this > topic. I don’t know what is your rule to arrange the meeting and talks. > However the reason you gave after the meeting is not acceptable./____ > > / /____ > > /Regards,/____ > > /Lucy/____ > > / /____ > > *From:*Int-area [mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Juan Carlos Zuniga > *Sent:* Monday, November 21, 2016 3:22 PM > *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > *Subject:* [Int-area] IETF97 Minutes____ > > ____ > > Here they are:____ > > ____ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-97-intarea/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-97-intarea/>____ > > ____ > > Thanks to Ian Farrer (and other Etherpad scribes) for taking notes during > the meeting.____ > > ____ > > Best,____ > > ____ > > Juan Carlos & Wassim____ > > __ __ > > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
