Lucy, We currently have only 5 WG accepted work items. IETF meeting-time is a precious and scarce resource that we try to optimize for all attendees.
Regarding the purpose of the IntArea meeting, please refer to the charter. A presentation like yours falls in the secondary role of the group, and for planning and other purposes it will be treated as such. Juan-Carlos On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Lucy yong <[email protected]> wrote: > *Hi Juan-Carlos,* > > > > *Could you request a long time for the WG meeting. The WG has 9 items and > one hour meeting; it is too short. I doubt if I will get a time in next > meeting if it is like this time. Allocating many 5min talks in a meeting > means no question at all. Is it the WG meeting intend?* > > > > *Regards,* > > *Lucy* > > > > *From:* Juan Carlos Zuniga [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2016 7:44 PM > *To:* Lucy yong > *Cc:* [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Int-area] IETF97 Minutes > > > > Lucy, > > > > We always arrange the agenda by Internet Area announcements, WG drafts, > individual drafts that have been presented/discussed before, and new > individual drafts - in that strict order. > > > > Your presentation was the last on the list, and the reason for not > presenting was that we ran out of time. It is not the first time that this > happens and one or more presentations are not given. There were several > questions on items that have been pending for a while, so we gave > preference to people asking questions (including you) over presentation > time. > > > > If you want to present your draft in the future, you can request time > again for the next meeting. However, we will still allocate agenda time in > the same strict order. If on the other hand what you want is to get > technical feedback from the group, you should rely on the mailing list and > not the meeting time, which tends to be very limited. > > > > Juan-Carlos > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Lucy yong <[email protected]> wrote: > > *Hi Juan and Wassim,* > > > > *It was my surprise that my talk time was cut out due to whatever reason. > I informed you very early about this new draft coming and asked 10min for > the talk, then the talk was cut to 5min and then not given a chance to talk > at all in the meeting. We worked very hard to make the deadline for this > new draft/topic in order to get people comments/suggestions on this topic. > I don’t know what is your rule to arrange the meeting and talks. However > the reason you gave after the meeting is not acceptable.* > > > > *Regards,* > > *Lucy* > > > > *From:* Int-area [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Juan > Carlos Zuniga > *Sent:* Monday, November 21, 2016 3:22 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [Int-area] IETF97 Minutes > > > > Here they are: > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-97-intarea/ > > > > Thanks to Ian Farrer (and other Etherpad scribes) for taking notes during > the meeting. > > > > Best, > > > > Juan Carlos & Wassim > > >
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
