Hi Joe, > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 11:33 AM > To: Templin, Fred L <fred.l.temp...@boeing.com>; Lucy yong > <lucy.y...@huawei.com>; Brian E Carpenter > <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>; int-area@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Int-area] Some thoughts on > draft-yong-intarea-inter-sites-over-tunnels > > > > On 11/30/2016 11:25 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote: > > Hi Joe, > > > > Very basically, the problem being solved is an overlay network over the > > Internet for inter-site tunneling between sites that may be either fixed > > or mobile. > > That's the same problem solved by every tunnel, isn't it? > > There is nothing unique about "inter-site" tunnels - all tunnels that > carry IP qualify. > > Endpoint mobility might be the new part, but in that case I'm not seeing > how this is a new problem (vs. any other sort of endpoint mobility, > e.g., use HIP, mobile IP, etc.). If that's the new part, it seems like > it belongs in a mobility WG, not here....
It is about more than just mobility - security, traffic engineering, routing control, VPN, and other aspects. What really makes AERO intarea-like is the fact that it is modeled as an NBMA link-layer for IP and can be considered an "IP-over-foo" document. Thanks - Fred fred.l.temp...@boeing.com > > Is this what you are looking for, or do you want specific use cases? > > That is close to what I was asking, but I'm not sure I see the answer yet... > Joe > > > > > Thanks - Fred > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu] > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:49 AM > >> To: Templin, Fred L <fred.l.temp...@boeing.com>; Lucy yong > >> <lucy.y...@huawei.com>; Brian E Carpenter > >> <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>; int-area@ietf.org > >> Subject: Re: [Int-area] Some thoughts on > >> draft-yong-intarea-inter-sites-over-tunnels > >> > >> Hi, Fred, et al., > >> > >> > >> On 11/30/2016 9:35 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote: > >>> How would people feel about seeing draft-templin-aerolink become an > >>> intarea > >>> document? > >> In one sense, every IP over X tunnel proposal could be an INTAREA doc, > >> but the bigger question is "what problem is being solved" that is > >> specific to INTAREA. > >> > >> Absent that goal statement, I'm not sure we should be adopting anything... > >> > >> Joe > > > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
