Dear all, The IntArea mailing list has been repeatedly used to debate draft-omar-ipv10. So far, comments posted on the mailing list have consistently pointed towards a highly controversial topic on multiple levels. This includes the lack of a valid problem statement as well as a clear and persistent disconnect between the suggested proposal in draft-omar-ipv10 and the current market trends, deployments and available solutions.
The IntArea AD and WG chairs are not satisfied with the nature and tone of the current exchange on the IntArea ML, nor enthusiastic about its potential prospect within the IntArea WG. However, the IntArea AD and WG chairs would like to encourage pursuing the discussion outside the IntArea WG if there is sufficient interest in the topic, e.g., on a separate mailing list. For this purpose, we would like to gauge the community interest to work on the problem statement and proposal described in draft-omar-IPv10 (possibly to be renamed IPmix). If you are interested in participating in the work mentioned above, please respond to this mail expressing your support by October 17, 2017. Regards, Juan Carlos, Wassim and Suresh IntArea WG Chairs + AD
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
