Forwarding private emails in public is an unlawful act (at least in general in 
EU is considered “breach of correspondence”).

I’ve doubts of what is the jurisdiction here, if the email receiver’s 
countries, if the email sender country, or the country where the IETF email 
servers are located, maybe even several of them.

Should IETF allow unlawful acts in the email exploders or should we do 
something about it?

I’m saying this not just by this email, but a sender that has done this many 
times.

Regards,
Jordi
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Int-area <[email protected]> en nombre de Joe Touch 
<[email protected]>
Responder a: <[email protected]>
Fecha: domingo, 8 de octubre de 2017, 0:33
Para: <[email protected]>
Asunto: Re: [Int-area] FW:  Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10)

    To others on the list: yes, this is another example of unauthorized 
forwarding of private mail. 
    
    However, in this case I’m glad.  
    
    In encourage others who have posted about this topic to make their position 
clear as well. 
    
    Joe
    
    > On Oct 7, 2017, at 2:56 PM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> 
wrote:
    > 
    > 
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Khaled Omar 
    > Sent: Saturday, October 7, 2017 11:56 PM
    > To: 'Joe Touch'
    > Subject: RE: [Int-area] Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10)
    > 
    >> Can you provide the list of who you think will participate?
    > 
    > You can check all e-mails sent to the int-area WG discussing IPmix 
(IPv10).
    > 
    >> I will not be participating further.
    > 
    > This is up to you.
    > 
    > Best regards,
    > 
    > Khaled Omar
    > 
    > 
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Joe Touch [mailto:[email protected]] 
    > Sent: Saturday, October 7, 2017 11:45 PM
    > To: Khaled Omar
    > Cc: Rolf Winter; int-area
    > Subject: Re: [Int-area] Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10)
    > 
    > 
    > 
    >> On Oct 7, 2017, at 9:41 AM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> 
wrote:
    >> 
    >> people started to participate 
    > 
    > Can you provide the list of who you think will participate?
    > 
    > To make my position clear, I cared only about making sure the name does 
no further damage to the IP version codepoint. I will not be participating 
further. 
    > 
    > Joe
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > Int-area mailing list
    > [email protected]
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
    
    _______________________________________________
    Int-area mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.



_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to