And so what is the problem with how, where and when I am proposing the adoption of my document?
daveor > On 27 Apr 2018, at 10:36, Amelia Andersdotter <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2018-04-27 11:30, Dave O'Reilly wrote: >>> This is not reflective of my experience. The details are tedious, but >>> RFC6302 in its current form, and even more so in the form proposed by >>> Dave, contains language reflective of objections to the law in my >>> jurisdiction as propagated by law enforcement officials. The irony of >>> that situation does not escape me, but neither does the gravity of the >>> risk that the IETF would aggravate the problem. >> >> Also, what’s the problem with a position being put forward by law >> enforcement officials? Do you not think they have a valid perspective on >> crime attribution? You might not agree with it, but that doesn’t mean there >> isn’t a point to be made. >> > > It's not a problem /that/, but /how/ and /where/. In the particular case > of these logging proposals, also /when/. > > best, > > -- > Amelia Andersdotter > Technical Consultant, Digital Programme > > ARTICLE19 > www.article19.org > > PGP: 3D5D B6CA B852 B988 055A 6A6F FEF1 C294 B4E8 0B55 > > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
