On 2018-04-27 23:01, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 27/04/2018 21:15, Amelia Andersdotter wrote: >> On 2018-04-27 04:00, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > ... >> i would have been slightly less annoyed had this not been the case. For >> this reason: >> >>> This is not an area where anybody in authority gives a fig about what >>> the IETF says. >> This is not reflective of my experience. The details are tedious, but >> RFC6302 in its current form, > We need to look at one of those details. /snip/ > > Therefore, the whole recommendation applies *only* to servers that > happen to log incoming IP addresses. In effect, the document says:
I was trying to clarify that I meant semantics inside of the IETF have consequences outside of the IETF. Therefore the response that semantics inside the IETF could *technically* be construed as being merely semantic isn't satisfying my concern. best regards, Amelia -- Amelia Andersdotter Technical Consultant, Digital Programme ARTICLE19 www.article19.org PGP: 3D5D B6CA B852 B988 055A 6A6F FEF1 C294 B4E8 0B55 _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
