On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:02 AM, Joe Touch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > From: Int-area <[email protected]> on behalf of > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 7:26 AM > To: Juan Carlos Zuniga <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in > Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing > Technologies > > Hi all, > > There is no reason to revisit or deprecate RFC6302: > · The root technical issues as documented by intarea (RC6269) are > still valid. Those issues will be experienced by more and more in the > future. > · RFC6302 records a valid technical recommendation for servers > logging IP addresses for abuse purposes. > > I don’t think that the IETF has to mandate or preclude (IP address) logging. > > > I agree with the last sentence above, but I also think that the IETF > shouldn’t be making “recommendations” in this area either (i.e., the last > sentence implies to me that RFC6302 needs to be deprecated). 6302 is about > identifying customers - not protocol or network diagnostics. > > IMO: > > - the IETF should speak to logging only when it relates to *protocol or > network diagnostics* > - this means that the current document should not proceed > - this means that RFC6302 should be deprecated > +1. More generally, I believe that IETF should not publish protocols or recommendations that are based on regulatory requirements.
Tom > Joe > > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
