Agree with Joe and Tom. From: Int-area [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe Touch Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 11:47 PM To: "徐小虎(义先)" <[email protected]> Cc: Internet Area <[email protected]>; intarea-chairs <[email protected]>; draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Int-area] 回复： Request a WG adoption call for draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp
It’s not complex. It’s already there. So there continues to be no reason to waste either a port number or further time discussing this draft. Joe On May 15, 2018, at 9:01 PM, 徐小虎(义先) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: IMHO，there seems no need to introduce such complexity into GUE just for the purpose of saving one port number. Xiaohu 来自钉钉专属商务邮箱<(null)> ------------------------------------------------------------------ 发件人：Tom Herbert<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 日 期：2018年05月16日 11:55:49 收件人：徐小虎(义先)<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 抄 送：Erik Kline<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Internet Area<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; intarea-chairs<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 主 题：Re: [Int-area] Request a WG adoption call for draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 8:33 PM, 徐小虎(义先) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Good question. This draft (draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp) describes a native > UDP encapsulation scheme for IP packets, which is straightforward and > light-weighted, just as MPLS-in-UDP [RFC7510] and TRILL-in-UDP > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-16#page-20) and etc. > GUE variant 1 implements native UDP encapsulation for IPv4 and IPv6. Except for a different port number, there is no protocol difference between that and doing IP in UDP as separate protocol. Tom > Best regards, > Xiaohu > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > From:Erik Kline <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Send Time:2018年5月16日(星期三) 11:07 > To:徐小虎(义先) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc:intarea-chairs > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; > draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; > Internet Area <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject:Re: [Int-area] Request a WG adoption call for > draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp > > Should this document make some comment about its relation, or lack of > relation, to https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-gue ? > On Wed, 16 May 2018 at 11:53, 徐小虎(义先) > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > >> Hi co-chairs, > >> We would like to request a WG adoption call for this draft ( > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-07) since it has > been stable enough and the solution as described in this draft is needed in > practice. > >> Best regards, >> Xiaohu (on behalf of all co-authors) >> _______________________________________________ >> Int-area mailing list >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area > > > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area<https://www.ietf..org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
