Hi Tom, Thanks for your review. Comments inline.....
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Herbert <t...@herbertland.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 11:03 AM > To: Ron Bonica <rbon...@juniper.net> > Cc: int-area@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Int-area] draft-bonica-intarea-frag-fragile-01 > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 6:16 AM, Ron Bonica <rbon...@juniper.net> wrote: > > Folks, > > > > Please review draft-bonica-intarea-frag-fragile-01 and provide comments. > The URL is https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- > 3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dbonica-2Dintarea-2Dfrag-2Dfragile- > 2D01&d=DwIBaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK- > ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=Fch9FQ82sir-BoLx84hKuKwl- > AWF2EfpHcAwrDThKP8&m=u5HvJHkDXwhk6jsejlj0NpC- > dEFpKMg3Pz0cKt63Xjs&s=4s_vPVzBk1YX8N_0eHzibCwEjp5cGS9TDYigTud_c5 > o&e=. > > > Ron, > > This draft should reference RFC4459 which gives a very good description of > MTU and fragmentation problems and handling for network tunnels. > RB> Agree. Added in next version. > GUE could be mentioned in the "IP encapsulations" sections. As proposed by > RFC4459, GUE extensions include a fragmentation option within the > encapsulation headers in lieu of doing IP fragmentation. > This is addresses several of the problems described for IP fragmentation. > RB> Could we defer this until GUE gets and RFC number. Otherwise, the draft may be required to list an amazing number of IP-in-IP encapsulations. Ron > Tom _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
