On 7/8/19 17:07, Joe Touch wrote: > > >> On Aug 7, 2019, at 7:01 AM, Fernando Gont <ferna...@gont.com.ar >> <mailto:ferna...@gont.com.ar>> wrote: >> >> On 7/8/19 16:30, Joe Touch wrote: >>> Things that don’t work aren’t always either deprecated or security >>> attacks. >>> >>> And if we treat them as such, the remainder won’t be useful to anyone >>> for anything. >> >> What I meant is that, whether one likes it or not, at the point >> something does not work (for some meaningful level of failure rate), you >> cannot rely on it anymore. (that wrt the "deprecated" (in a colloquial >> way) bit). >> [...] > > To the IESG: wordsmithing this document is a bad idea unless it comes > with a substantial revision explaining the impact of stronger warnings > AND is taken back to the WG for consensus.
Agree with this. This is what the wg agreed on. It's always possible to go for stronger advice in the future, if warranted. No need to boil the ocean now. -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
