Folks,
We appear to be rehashing issues that have been debated passionately before.
And I think that we have the following options:
1) Continue to debate, as if we might someday converge on consensus.
2) Agree to disagree.
If we follow the first path, we will need a continuity plan. As those who are
participating in the debate age, retire, and pass on to the next life, they
will need to be replaced by new participants. Otherwise, the debate will
subside without concluding.
If we follow the second path, we will need to figure out what to do with this
document. Options are:
- Abandon it
- Progress it as it was approved by the IESG and ignoring all contrary opinions
- Progress it as it was approved by the IESG and add an appendix recording
contrary opinions and identifying them as such
- Progress it as it was approved by the IESG, deleting controversial sections
and remaining silent on these issues
Does anybody see any other options?
Mischievously yours,
Ron
Juniper Business Use Only
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
