> On Sep 4, 2019, at 10:34 AM, Ron Bonica <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> If we follow the second path, we will need to figure out what to do with this
> document. Options are:
>
> - Abandon it
> - Progress it as it was approved by the IESG and ignoring all contrary
> opinions
> - Progress it as it was approved by the IESG and add an appendix recording
> contrary opinions and identifying them as such
> - Progress it as it was approved by the IESG, deleting controversial sections
> and remaining silent on these issues
>
> Does anybody see any other options?
You seem to be overlooking:
- progress it as it was approved by the WG and IETF LC and add an appendix
recording contrary IESG opinions and identifying them as such
- progress it based on the text I suggested as was agreed by consensus in this
discussion and add an appendix recording contrary IESG opinions and identifying
them as such
This isn’t an IESG opinion. They get to write those themselves.
Joe
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
