Hello Toerless,

It seems related to intarea indeed (by reading the abstract) but possibly wider 
as well.

Did you consider DISPATCH (yesterday alas...) ?

May I also suggest to run a 2nd call as tomorrow is really short notice?

-éric

-----Original Message-----
From: Int-area <[email protected]> on behalf of Toerless Eckert 
<[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, 24 March 2020 at 03:10
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>
Subject: [Int-area] FYI/Feedback for draft-bryant-arch-fwd-layer-ps-00

    Dear intarea WG
    
    We think draft 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bryant-arch-fwd-layer-ps/
    does in part touch aspects related to intarea, so we are interested in
    your opinion/feedback. We think its mostly architectual through, so
    maybe [email protected] is more appropriate for overall
    discussions on the topic right now.
    
    Before Corona, we had planned to have an inoffical side-meeting to
    discuss the topic, we have now set up a virtual inofficial side-meeting
    instead, This wednesday 03/25/2020, 1500 UTC. Info here:
    
    https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietf/meeting/wiki/ietf107replacements
    https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/v107-side-meeting
    
    Cheers
       Toerless (for the authors)
    
    _______________________________________________
    Int-area mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
    

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to