On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:06:53AM -0700, Joseph Touch wrote: > > > > On Mar 24, 2020, at 10:56 AM, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mar 24, 2020, at 1:52 PM, Toerless Eckert <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> But without a longer term architectural track doing work like this > >> in parallel to current WGs, it will be difficult for the IETF to really > >> drive > >> innovation at the network / forwarding layer longer term. > > > > Is this something we are even competent to do? > > By person, sure. > > By group, i.e., does INTAREA or any other area, or even (or especially) the > IAB, IMO - NO. > > Papers like this are great ways to start beer chats or kickstart panel > discussions but don???t do much IMO to move the needle forward. What matter > are targeted answers, and those aren???t often the result of group-think (see > ???the Innovator???s Dilemma???*)
Agreed. But at least to me it looks quite helpfull to even start attempting to write down the problem statemens, because they are not necessarily trivial. Btw: How did you folks manage to get this thread on int-area. I specifiy had a "Reply-To: [email protected]" into my first email, to avoid this segmentation of discussion along IETF area boundaries ;-)) Cheers Toerless _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
