Thanks, Joe
Happy to take input on how to improve. This is a -00, and
a lot o the problems are not that easy to explain at their
fundamental level. And going into detail difficult to keep
the size in check.
If there are any specific issues in scope of the document,
included or not that you are interested, i'd certainly
like to hear about it from you.
Cheers
Toerless
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 09:01:34PM -0700, Joseph Touch wrote:
> Reads like an academic white paper. Worth about as much of my attention.
>
> Sorry, but you asked.
>
> Joe
>
> > On Mar 23, 2020, at 7:09 PM, Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Dear intarea WG
> >
> > We think draft
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bryant-arch-fwd-layer-ps/
> > does in part touch aspects related to intarea, so we are interested in
> > your opinion/feedback. We think its mostly architectual through, so
> > maybe [email protected] is more appropriate for overall
> > discussions on the topic right now.
> >
> > Before Corona, we had planned to have an inoffical side-meeting to
> > discuss the topic, we have now set up a virtual inofficial side-meeting
> > instead, This wednesday 03/25/2020, 1500 UTC. Info here:
> >
> > https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietf/meeting/wiki/ietf107replacements
> > https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/v107-side-meeting
> >
> > Cheers
> > Toerless (for the authors)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Int-area mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
--
---
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
