> > "You're assuming that both host and network mobility can coexist. > > On the surface this sounds conciliatory and ideal, but > I'm afraid > > it's not practical." > > > > is clearly incorrect. > > In practice local and global mobility schemes co-exist.
=> Of course. For > example, MIP > can co-exist with 802.11 handoff schemes (e.g. 11i, 11r). > So I think that > it will be required to point out specific co-existence > issues, rather than > asserting that the generic co-existence problem has no > practical solution. => Please see my response to this point to Henrik. I don't think IP-based NETLMM and host-based LMM can coexist. Of course host-based LMM and link-layer mobility in general coexist everywhere. Hesham _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
