> On the other hand, if the IETF doesn't do a standard, then we're > really hosed, because the ISPs may implement solutions for which the
IETF has already done a standard exactly for this problem: PANA. What we are discussing is additionally defining another protocol, a fully redundant one (putting aside all of its problems), just because some like that other protocol. Alper > protocol is not specified in an open way. So refusing to cooperate > here may cause more harm than good - it would be better if we could > find a solution that's acceptable to everyone, even if it is not one > that everyone can love (do we ever have one of those?). > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
