On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:08:45 +0200, Clemens Eisserer <[email protected]> wrote: > With 2.11.901 everything seems to be fine, but I wonder - what is the > preferred way to do this across different drivers (EXA)? > I remember I decided to go with the 1x1 pixmap because EXA back then > didn't like solid fills with alpha value, and 1x1 pixmaps performed > quite well everywhere.
If it did not trigger fallbacks in the current EXA drivers, I would recommend going with SolidFill instead of 1x1 pixmaps (and similarly would enable them in Cairo). Using SolidFill (PineView): 36000000 trep @ 0.0008 msec (1290000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10) 32000000 trep @ 0.0008 msec (1270000.0/sec): Char in 80-char rgb line (Charter 10) Using 1x1R (PineView): 32000000 trep @ 0.0008 msec (1250000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line (Charter 10) 32000000 trep @ 0.0008 msec (1230000.0/sec): Char in 80-char rgb line (Charter 10) Whilst that only indicates a 4% throughput improvement in a pretty ideal scenario, for a more normal application there is also a reduction in the volume of X traffic, as creating a SolidFill is much cheaper than creating and filling a 1x1R. Also the above benchmark does not reveal the cost of immediately using a 1x1R as a solid colour after creation, as that incurs the overhead of a readback currently. -ickle -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
