On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 22:16:58 +0200, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > This way active buffers are scanned in retiring order, whereas your code > scans them in issuing order. IMHO the former is the fairer approach for > eviction when both rings are busy. I also think the code would look > slightly less scary ;)
Hmm, I was aiming for retiring order, I may have missed. But yes, the true goal is for this to be clear from the code, and here my preference was for unrolling the loop so that the order was apparent. Obviously I have failed on one or both accounts. -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
