On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:43:28 -0700, Eric Anholt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:22:35 -0700, Ian Romanick <[email protected]> wrote: > > So, we're currently using too many threads in some cases? Could this be > > related to bug #35730? In that case the failure seems to be limited to > > SugarBay. I believe that's GT1, but I can never get the code names for > > these chips straight. > > Nope, note how instead of using that original wm_max_threads value, 40 > is hardcoded in the place that should have been using it.
But for DevSmallGT (which *is* GT1 right?) max VS threads is only 24. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
