On Thu, 12 May 2011 18:16:00 -0700, Keith Packard <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 12 May 2011 22:17:22 +0100, Chris Wilson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > ... as they only had a single PCI-ID each, and so using the pci-id is > > easier than using a capability bit. > > This doesn't seem useful to me; it only saves a couple of bits in the > struct and replaces that with compares. Meh.
The switch is from a comparatively expensive compare to a cheaper compare *consistent* with the other individual chipset identifiers. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
