On 10/31/11 2:43 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:56:58 -0400, Adam Jackson<[email protected]> wrote:
Yeah, it won't be precise. That's why there's PLL search code at all,
and why it has a fuzz factor for finding "good enough".
Right, so we'll need a similar fuzz factor when deciding whether we
actually need to flip modes or not. Makes me concerned that we'll be
effectively ignoring minor changes in the mode, which will make tweaking
dot clocks impossible.
I don't see why we'd need to use the same equality operator everywhere.
The case of "is userspace asking for a fine-tune" seems clearly
distinguishable from "are the current panel timings close enough to what
EDID asked for".
- ajax
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
