On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:09:18PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:48:35PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > Until the snoopable ones are debugged. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c | 3 +-- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c > > index 8d5bef3..25911a1 100644 > > --- a/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c > > +++ b/drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c > > @@ -1186,8 +1186,7 @@ static void valleyview_write_entry(dma_addr_t addr, > > unsigned int entry, > > unsigned int gfdt = flags & AGP_USER_CACHED_MEMORY_GFDT; > > u32 pte_flags; > > > > - if (type_mask == AGP_USER_MEMORY) > > - pte_flags = GEN6_PTE_UNCACHED | I810_PTE_VALID; > > + pte_flags = GEN6_PTE_UNCACHED | I810_PTE_VALID; > > Squash this with the previous one. Even for the snb we'll never see > AGP_USER_MEMORY because only the ums driver ever used this. Before gem. > And I think even then you need to dig out pretty old userspace to actually > see it.
Scrap the AGP_USER_MEMORY comment, Chris corrected me on irc that I'm talking nonsense. I've confused this with the old code from i81x, too many nightmares from reading that stuff ;-) 'The squash with previous' still holds. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: [email protected] Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
