On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:48:46PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > intel_clear_scanline_wait tries to clear ring wait conditions when we > turn off pipes, to prevent hanging WAIT_EVENT and similar commands. But > we call it early before rings have been setup during initialization and > shouldn't touch the ring regs yet. > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
Just a curious question: Does vlv not like this and blow up or is this just something that poped up in register trace/code reviewing? -Daniel > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++++ > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index dc0ef17..1a8cb30 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -3098,6 +3098,10 @@ static void intel_clear_scanline_wait(struct > drm_device *dev) > > ring = LP_RING(dev_priv); > > + /* This may be called before rings are initialized */ > + if (!ring->mmio_base) > + return; > + > tmp = I915_READ_CTL(ring); > if (tmp & RING_WAIT) > I915_WRITE_CTL(ring, tmp); > -- > 1.7.5.4 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Mail: [email protected] Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
