On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:11:25 +0100 Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:48:37PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > ValleyView handles force wake differently than previous chipsets, so add > > a couple of new functions for it. > > > > But it's also untested, so no need to call these untested functions yet. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]> > > So we have forcewake but we don't need forcewak?! Can you explain how this > works for dense me a bit? We need force wake, just not for any parts I've tested yet (the early ones had the Punit disabled). This code adheres to the spec, but I'll need a part with the Punit enabled in order to test & verify. Until then we can leave it disabled. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
