On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 06:24:38PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]> > > PCH PLLs aren't required for outputs on the CPU, so we shouldn't just > treat them as part of the pipe. > > So split the code out and manage PCH PLLs separately, allocating them > when needed or trying to re-use existing PCH PLL setups when the timings > match. > > v2: add num_pch_pll field to dev_priv (Daniel) > don't NULL the pch_pll pointer in disable or DPMS will fail (Jesse) > put register offsets in pll struct (Chris) > > v3: Decouple enable/disable of PLLs from get/put. > > Fixes https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44309 > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Patch applied to dinq with Jesse's irc reviewed-by and tested-by, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: [email protected] Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
