We no longer need to take the struct_mutex for freeing objects, and on
the finalisation paths here the mutex is not been used for serialisation
of the pointer access, so remove the BKL wart.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 14 ++++++--------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
index 1aa85236b788..77a5c27b9da0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
@@ -699,12 +699,9 @@ static void guc_fw_fetch(struct drm_device *dev, struct
intel_guc_fw *guc_fw)
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("GuC fw fetch status FAIL; err %d, fw %p, obj %p\n",
err, fw, guc_fw->guc_fw_obj);
- mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
- obj = guc_fw->guc_fw_obj;
+ obj = fetch_and_zero(&guc_fw->guc_fw_obj);
if (obj)
i915_gem_object_put(obj);
- guc_fw->guc_fw_obj = NULL;
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
release_firmware(fw); /* OK even if fw is NULL */
guc_fw->guc_fw_fetch_status = GUC_FIRMWARE_FAIL;
@@ -781,16 +778,17 @@ void intel_guc_fini(struct drm_device *dev)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw = &dev_priv->guc.guc_fw;
+ struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
guc_interrupts_release(dev_priv);
i915_guc_submission_disable(dev_priv);
i915_guc_submission_fini(dev_priv);
-
- if (guc_fw->guc_fw_obj)
- i915_gem_object_put(guc_fw->guc_fw_obj);
- guc_fw->guc_fw_obj = NULL;
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+ obj = fetch_and_zero(&guc_fw->guc_fw_obj);
+ if (obj)
+ i915_gem_object_put(obj);
+
guc_fw->guc_fw_fetch_status = GUC_FIRMWARE_NONE;
}
--
2.10.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
