On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srini...@intel.com> wrote:
> From: Uma Shankar <uma.shan...@intel.com>
>
> Enable MIPI IO WA for BXT DSI as per bspec and
> program the DSI regulators.
>
> v2: Moved IO enable to pre-enable as per Mika's
> review comments. Also reused the existing register
> definition for BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON.
>
> v3: Added Programming the DSI regulators as per disable/enable
> sequences.
>
> v4: Restricting regulator changes to BXT as suggested by
> Jani/Mika

This applies to BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON changes as well.

One other question inline.

>
> Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shan...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h  |  7 +++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 00970aa..0a9ad44 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -1553,6 +1553,7 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
>       _MMIO(_BXT_PHY_CH(phy, ch, reg_ch0, reg_ch1))
>  
>  #define BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON               _MMIO(0x138090)
> +#define  MIPIO_RST_CTRL                              (1 << 2)
>  
>  #define _BXT_PHY_CTL_DDI_A           0x64C00
>  #define _BXT_PHY_CTL_DDI_B           0x64C10
> @@ -8301,6 +8302,12 @@ enum {
>  #define _BXT_MIPIC_PORT_CTRL                         0x6B8C0
>  #define BXT_MIPI_PORT_CTRL(tc)       _MMIO_MIPI(tc, _BXT_MIPIA_PORT_CTRL, 
> _BXT_MIPIC_PORT_CTRL)
>  
> +#define BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_CFG                      _MMIO(0x160020)
> +#define  STAP_SELECT                                 (1 << 0)
> +
> +#define BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_TX_CTRL          _MMIO(0x160054)
> +#define  HS_IO_CTRL_SELECT                           (1 << 0)
> +
>  #define  DPI_ENABLE                                  (1 << 31) /* A + C */
>  #define  MIPIA_MIPI4DPHY_DELAY_COUNT_SHIFT           27
>  #define  MIPIA_MIPI4DPHY_DELAY_COUNT_MASK            (0xf << 27)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> index 16732e7..4dc1293 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> @@ -548,6 +548,7 @@ static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder 
> *encoder,
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
>       struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
>       enum port port;
> +     u32 val;
>  
>       DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
>  
> @@ -558,6 +559,11 @@ static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder 
> *encoder,
>       intel_disable_dsi_pll(encoder);
>       intel_enable_dsi_pll(encoder, pipe_config);
>  
> +     /* Add MIPI IO reset programming for modeset */
> +     val = I915_READ(BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON);
> +     I915_WRITE(BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON,
> +                             val | MIPIO_RST_CTRL);
> +
>       intel_dsi_prepare(encoder, pipe_config);
>  
>       /* Panel Enable over CRC PMIC */
> @@ -575,6 +581,14 @@ static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder 
> *encoder,
>               I915_WRITE(DSPCLK_GATE_D, val);
>       }
>  
> +     /* Power up DSI regulator */
> +     if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) {
> +             I915_WRITE(BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_CFG, STAP_SELECT);
> +             val = I915_READ(BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_TX_CTRL);
> +             val &= ~HS_IO_CTRL_SELECT;
> +             I915_WRITE(BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_TX_CTRL, val);

Why does this specific change warrant a read-modify-write when the other
regulator changes in this patch do a full register write?

Also, the enable and disable sequences seem a bit asymmetric with these
changes, i.e. you enable and disable things in different steps of the
sequences. That's a bit surprising.

(These might have an answer in bspec, but I don't seem to be able to
access that right now.)


BR,
Jani.

> +     }
> +
>       /* put device in ready state */
>       intel_dsi_device_ready(encoder);
>  
> @@ -707,6 +721,7 @@ static void intel_dsi_post_disable(struct intel_encoder 
> *encoder,
>  {
>       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
>       struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> +     u32 val;
>  
>       DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
>  
> @@ -714,8 +729,18 @@ static void intel_dsi_post_disable(struct intel_encoder 
> *encoder,
>  
>       intel_dsi_clear_device_ready(encoder);
>  
> +     val = I915_READ(BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON);
> +     I915_WRITE(BXT_P_CR_GT_DISP_PWRON,
> +                             val & ~MIPIO_RST_CTRL);
> +
>       intel_disable_dsi_pll(encoder);
>  
> +     if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) {
> +             /* Power down DSI regulator to save power */
> +             I915_WRITE(BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_CFG, STAP_SELECT);
> +             I915_WRITE(BXT_P_DSI_REGULATOR_TX_CTRL, HS_IO_CTRL_SELECT);
> +     }
> +
>       if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
>               u32 val;

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to