Instead of having each back-end provide identical guards, just have a
singular set in intel_set_rps() to verify that the caller is obeying the
rules.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 12 ++++--------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 4e9488bd9c3c..9a5af34db74d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -4915,10 +4915,6 @@ static u32 gen6_rps_pm_mask(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv, u8 val)
  * update the GEN6_RP_INTERRUPT_LIMITS register accordingly. */
 static int gen6_set_rps(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 val)
 {
-       WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock));
-       WARN_ON(val > dev_priv->rps.max_freq);
-       WARN_ON(val < dev_priv->rps.min_freq);
-
        /* min/max delay may still have been modified so be sure to
         * write the limits value.
         */
@@ -4954,10 +4950,6 @@ static int valleyview_set_rps(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv, u8 val)
 {
        int err;
 
-       WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock));
-       WARN_ON(val > dev_priv->rps.max_freq);
-       WARN_ON(val < dev_priv->rps.min_freq);
-
        if (WARN_ONCE(IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv) && (val & 1),
                      "Odd GPU freq value\n"))
                val &= ~1;
@@ -5108,6 +5100,10 @@ int intel_set_rps(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 
val)
 {
        int err;
 
+       lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
+       GEM_BUG_ON(val > dev_priv->rps.max_freq);
+       GEM_BUG_ON(val < dev_priv->rps.min_freq);
+
        if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
                err = valleyview_set_rps(dev_priv, val);
        else
-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to