On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 05:27:07PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
>
> The 845/865 and 830/855/9xx+ style cursor don't have that
> much in common with each other, so let's just split the
> .check_plane() hook into two variants as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 232
> ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 145 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 222f54ffd113..41cbaee66f1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -9269,6 +9269,74 @@ static void i845_disable_cursor(struct intel_plane
> *plane,
> i845_update_cursor(plane, NULL, NULL);
> }
>
> +static bool i845_cursor_size_ok(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
> + to_i915(plane_state->base.plane->dev);
> + int width = plane_state->base.crtc_w;
> + int height = plane_state->base.crtc_h;
> +
> + if (width == 0 || height == 0)
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * 845g/865g are only limited by the width of their cursors,
> + * the height is arbitrary up to the precision of the register.
> + */
> + if ((width & 63) != 0)
if (!IS_ALIGNED(width, 64)) ?
> + return false;
> +
> + if (width > (IS_I845G(dev_priv) ? 64 : 512))
> + return false;
> +
> + if (height > 1023)
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> static void i9xx_update_cursor(struct intel_plane *plane,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
> @@ -9328,41 +9396,92 @@ static void i9xx_disable_cursor(struct intel_plane
> *plane,
> i9xx_update_cursor(plane, NULL, NULL);
> }
>
> -static bool cursor_size_ok(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - uint32_t width, uint32_t height)
> +static bool i9xx_cursor_size_ok(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
> + to_i915(plane_state->base.plane->dev);
> + int width = plane_state->base.crtc_w;
> + int height = plane_state->base.crtc_h;
> +
> if (width == 0 || height == 0)
> return false;
>
> /*
> - * 845g/865g are special in that they are only limited by
> - * the width of their cursors, the height is arbitrary up to
> - * the precision of the register. Everything else requires
> - * square cursors, limited to a few power-of-two sizes.
> + * Cursors are limited to a few power-of-two
> + * sizes, and they must be square.
> */
> - if (IS_I845G(dev_priv) || IS_I865G(dev_priv)) {
> - if ((width & 63) != 0)
> + switch (width | height) {
> + case 256:
> + case 128:
> + if (IS_GEN2(dev_priv))
> return false;
> + case 64:
> + break;
> + default:
> + return false;
Checks out ok.
> + }
There's still quite a bit of boilerplate duplication between the two
check_plane functions. No chance for some sharing? I presume their is
also an ulterior motive for the split in later patches. That would be
worth mentioning in the changelog to quell some of the doubts over
duplication.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
