Check that we have disabled irqs before we take the spin_lock around
reassigned the breadcrumbs.irq_wait.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
index 3f222dee4c25..35529b35a276 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
@@ -301,8 +301,11 @@ static inline void __intel_breadcrumbs_next(struct 
intel_engine_cs *engine,
 {
        struct intel_breadcrumbs *b = &engine->breadcrumbs;
 
+       GEM_BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
+
        spin_lock(&b->irq_lock);
        GEM_BUG_ON(!b->irq_armed);
+       GEM_BUG_ON(!b->irq_wait);
        b->irq_wait = to_wait(next);
        spin_unlock(&b->irq_lock);
 
@@ -395,8 +398,10 @@ static bool __intel_engine_add_wait(struct intel_engine_cs 
*engine,
        }
 
        if (first) {
-               spin_lock(&b->irq_lock);
                GEM_BUG_ON(rb_first(&b->waiters) != &wait->node);
+               GEM_BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
+
+               spin_lock(&b->irq_lock);
                b->irq_wait = wait;
                /* After assigning ourselves as the new bottom-half, we must
                 * perform a cursory check to prevent a missed interrupt.
-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to