On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:53:53AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On 17-03-21 16:23:05, Tahvanainen, Jari wrote: > >See below [Jari]... > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Ben Widawsky [mailto:[email protected]] > >Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 5:38 PM > >To: Tahvanainen, Jari <[email protected]> > >Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>; [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [01/15] drm/i915: Copy user requested buffers into the error > >state > > > >On 17-03-21 11:30:36, Tahvanainen, Jari wrote: > >>Note that this is for all the patches in series, replied only on [1/15]. > >> > >>See also https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94001#c45 > >> > > > >Jari, did you test this patch specifically? It would involve introspection > >of the error state. > > > >[Jari] like said I tested the patch series including this patch > > " Note that this is for all the patches in series, replied only on > > [1/15]" > > Tested-by " for https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/21377"; > > > > If this is not the way to do it then I need to stop. > > And since being tester (not programmer) you need to tell more > > what do you mean with " would involve introspection of the error state". > > What should be outcome? What skill shall have for it, etc.? If I cannot > > do it then assumable tested-by is not the thing that I will do in future. > > Well there is tested-by "this doesn't regress anything" and there is tested-by > "this new feature works properly". I've no doubt you asserted the first, but > my > concern was around the second. For this patch specifically, it's a new feature > and there is no igt test for it AFAIK.
There is/will be, gem_exec_capture; sent alongside the original patch. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
