On 06/29/2012 06:56 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Ok, after reviewing this with the gen6 code and hsw power doc I see very > few differences (besides the 2 things that look like mistakes): > - we don't set a few things related to rc6p&rc6pp > - we have slightly different timeout/threshold values. > > When copy&pasting code we should balance the risk of introducing > regressions with the risk to not apply bugfixes everywhere they're needed. > Given that you've missed Jesse's fix while hacking on this and that this > seems to work very much like rps on snb/ivb I'd vote for sprinkling a few > ifs into gen6_enable_rps. Maybe set the timing values in local variables > at the beginning of the function.
Sure, I'll do this and send the patch. Eugeni _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
