On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:58:25AM -0700, Michel Thierry wrote: > On 25/05/17 08:31, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: > > > > > >On 22/05/17 12:56, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > >>On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:50:28AM -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: > >>>We're currently deleting the GuC logs if the FW fails to load, but those > >>>are still useful to understand why the loading failed. Keeping the > >>>object around allows us to access them after driver load is completed. > >>> > >>>v2: keep the object around instead of using kernel memory (chris) > >>> don't store the logs in the gpu_error struct (Chris) > >>> add a check on guc_log_level to avoid snapshotting empty logs > >>> > >>>v3: use separate debugfs for error log (Chris) > >>> > >>>v4: rebased > >>> > >>>v5: clean up obj selection, move err_load inside guc_log, move err_load > >>> cleanup, rename functions (Michal) > >>> > >>>v6: move obj back to intel_guc, move functions to intel_uc.c, don't > >>> clear obj on new GuC load, free object only if enable_guc_loading > >>> is set (Michal) > >>> > >>>Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > >>>Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.ma...@intel.com> > >>>Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com> > >>>Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com> > >>>--- > >> > >>Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com> > >> > >>Regards, > >>Michal > >> > > > >Does anyone else have any concern or can this patch be merged? > > > > +1 about being merged, and since I've been using this patch you could say,
And done. Thanks for the patch, testing and review. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
